Alan Hirsch speaks about the risk-averse church in America.
Alan Hirsch on Risky Church
Posted by Mike Weaver on May 13, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/alan-hirsch-on-risky-church/
John Ortberg Interviews Gabe Lyons
In this fascinating video, John Ortberg interviews Gabe Lyons about the changes facing American Christianity, particuarly among the younger generations.
Posted by Mike Weaver on May 13, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/john-ortberg-interviews-gabe-lyons/
The scandal of crossing boundaries
…the followers of John Wesley, who had performed an act of ordination for which he had no ecclesiastical authority, would probably be more horrified than any other body of Christians if one of their members today did the same.
–Lesslie Newbigin (Household, p. 77)
Posted by Mike Weaver on January 26, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/256/
A most binding association…
We can all call to mind movements which have begun as pure upsurges of fresh spiritual vitality, breaking through and revolting against the hardened structure of the older body, and claiming, in the name of the Spirit, liberty from outward forms and institutions. And we have seen how rapidly they develop their own forms, their own structures of thought, of language, and of organization. It would surely be a very unbiblical view of human nature and history to think-as we so often, in our pagan way, do-that this is just an example of the tendency of all things to slide down from a golden age to an age of iron, to identify the spiritual with the disembodied, and to regard visible structure as equivalent to sin. We must rather recognize here a testimony to the fact that Christianity is, in its very heart and essence, not a disembodied spirituality, but life in a visible fellowship, a life which makes such total claim upon us, and so engages our total powers, that nothing less than the closest and most binding association of men with one another can serve its purpose.
–Lesslie Newbigin (Household of God, pp. 76-77)
Posted by Mike Weaver on January 26, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/a-most-binding-association/
Church as surprise
Missiology studies the growth of the Church into new peoples, the birth of the Church beyond its social boundaries; beyond the linguistic barriers within which she feels at home; beyond the poetical images in which she taught her children. The Church is led to marvel about the ever new images in which her venerable knowledge can become meaningful for the first time … missiology therefore is the study of the Church as surprise.
–Catholic theologian Ivan Illich
Posted by Mike Weaver on January 21, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/church-as-surprise/
Hello world!
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
Posted by Mike Weaver on January 8, 2011
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/hello-world/
The church as missionary
Christian faith is missionary both in its essence and in its history. At the heart of the Christian faith lie assumptions about the Lord and the Ground of the universe and the common nature of humanity and affirmations about Jesus Christ that forbid its appropriation to any person, group or community as a private possession. The conviction that Jesus is Lord and the testimony that Christ is risen cannot mean that much unless they are to be shared. But both the faith of Christians and the nature of the church are missionary in a much deeper sense, more closely related to the “sending” idea from which the word “missionary” came…The mission of the church is not simply to add to itself but to bear witness that by his cross and resurrection Christ brought back the whole creation and defeated the powers that spoil it. In this sense all Christian life is missionary, as is the work of Christians and their commerce and habits of life, their art and music and every activity that demands choice.
–Missiologist and Historian Andrew Walls
Posted by Mike Weaver on March 22, 2009
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/128/
What we can learn from E. Stanley Jones
A few years ago, a trip to the Middle East gave me an opportunity to get to know a number of Muslims who lived in Saudi Arabia and surrounding countries. The conversations that I had with some of those Muslims were rewarding, intense, and quite theological. We explored one another’s religious backgrounds, discovered significant differences, and even some similarities.
Today, within our neighborhoods and communities, the number of committed believers of other faiths is steadily increasing. We no longer need to travel to the Middle East or Asia to find passionate Muslims, Hindus, or other non-Christian believers. Some of them are right next door, and this new situation presents a crisis of faith for many of us.
I suspect that none of this would be a great surprise to E. Stanley Jones. He spent many years in India doing his best to “offer Christ” to those who did not know Christ, including the leader of India at the time, Ghandi. This great Methodist evangelist and missionary probably knew that the diversity of religions he experienced in India would soon enough find its way to the great social melting pot of America.
In the midst of religious diversity, I suspect that we are prone to chose from one of several extremes. We might, on the one hand, decide that theological integrity requires us to separate ourselves from those who believe differently. Pointing out our differences, our fear of being “unequally yoked” might prevent us from even becoming friends with neighbors who regularly attend temples, mosques, or even synagogues.
On the other hand, our desire to pursue unity, and even civic responsibility, might encourage us to set aside our differences and find the common ground. The uniqueness of Christ and his work on the cross for the salvation of the WHOLE world might well fade away in the passion of interfaith activity. Jesus’ call to make disciples of ALL nations might be neglected for fear of the offense that it might cause.
I believe that E. Stanley Jones can help us to navigate this new religious frontier. He ministered in colonial India, a country where Christianity was a marginal minority. Every day he rubbed elbows with Hindus and Muslims, many of them some of the most influential men and women in the country. He established retreat experiences called Ashrams, where people of various faiths came to talk and learn from one another. He created roundtable discussions for people to share their own religious story no matter what their faith.
But what I find remarkable about Stanley Jones was that in the midst of all this “dialogue” – which he considered so essential to establishing relationships with others – he never lost his passion to lead people to Christ. He never surrendered the centrality of Christ for the salvation of the world. He never put down other religions or called them false. But he always pointed to Christ as the final answer and kept offering him to friends and acquaintances. He even offered Christ through his friendship with Ghandi. It pained him dearly that Ghandi never accepted the offer.
Can we follow Jones’s lead? Can we become good friends with those who believe differently from us? Can we advance social causes through cooperation with people of other faiths? And, just as importantly, can we find the courage, in the midst of our friendships and dialogues, to offer Christ to ALL who do not know him?Maybe it’s time for the church to learn how to be witnesses again. Maybe we can teach them about the witness of E. Stanley Jones.
© 2007 Michael Weaver
Posted by Mike Weaver on August 17, 2007
http://mikeweaver.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/what-we-can-learn-from-e-stanley-jones/
